Julian Assange faces effective life sentence if convicted in US, court told


Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange when he was being arrested at the Ecuadorian embassy in London last year. PHOTO/SCREENSHOT/BBC


Wikileaks founder Julian Assange faces an effective life sentence in harsh prison conditions if convicted in the United States, a lawyer has said.

Assange is fighting extradition following leaks of hundreds of thousands of classified documents in 2010 and 2011.

The 49-year-old has been indicted in the US on 18 charges including plotting to hack computers and conspiring to obtain and disclose national defence information.

The allegations include that Assange plotted with army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning to crack a scrambled password to a classified US Department of Defence computer.

According to Press Gazette his defence claim the prosecution under the Donald Trump administration has been politically motivated.

Giving evidence at the Old Bailey by video link, US lawyer Eric Lewis said it was “significant” that Assange had not been indicted until 2018 when, by contrast, Manning, was arrested in 2010 and convicted in 2013.

Previously, it had all but been concluded the Department of Justice would not prosecute Assange but under the Trump administration that changed, Lewis said.

Lewis suggested the US attorney general was “directing from the top down from his office to the Eastern District of Virginia to be much tougher on leakers, including Mr Assange”.

Related stories:

Ex-Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger: ‘Surprising more cant’ see Assange case is worrying for all journalists’

Peter Oborne on Julian Assange: Future generations of journalists will not forgive us if we do not fight extradition

US conspiracy charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange ‘politically motivated’

The later addition of multiple espionage charges was “an abuse of the federal law enforcement authority”, he alleged.

It meant that if convicted, Assange would face an effective life sentence, Lewis said.

“We are looking at a sentence somewhere between 20 years, if everything goes brilliantly, to 175 years which the government could easily ask for,” he said.

He pointed out that Manning had been sentenced to 35 years in prison before that was commuted to seven years.

Lewis said the US government took a “very harsh view in respect of national security defendants” and Assange could be detained under SAMs – special administrative measures.

The witness said Assange was “particularly vulnerable” to deprivation under SAMs, such as not being allowed access to the news.

Related stories:

WikiLeaks ‘fundamental’ in documenting war crimes and human rights violations, court hears

Assange hearing told that Wikileaks revelations unveiled true extent of civilian deaths in Iraq war

UK court told Assange trial ‘political’

Lewis, who provided five statements to the court, also argued that Assange “will not receive adequate mental health care in a US prison”.

Under cross-examination, Lewis conceded that he was not a medical expert.

The extradition case, which is in its fourth day of evidence, is expected to go on for four weeks.

Before lunch on Monday, the video link to Lewis was interrupted by the sound of an apparent news broadcast.

After the adjournment, the video link went down for more than half an hour.

When Lewis reappeared on the screen, his voice appeared tinny and distorted as technicians attempted to identify the technical glitch.

The ongoing technical problem dragged on into the afternoon and Judge Vanessa Baraitser adjourned the case until Tuesday.

Help us to report stories that expose human rights violations, corruption, environmental degradation, spark reforms and generally spotlight issues of public interest.
While traditional news reporting is losing its relevance, serious investigation now requires more than basic journalistic skills. To do this we require a lot of resources.

Nelson Mandela once said: “A critical, independent, and investigative press is the lifeblood of any democracy. The press must be free from state interference. It must have the economic strength to stand up to the blandishments of government officials. It must have sufficient independence from vested interests to be bold and inquiring without fear or favor. It must enjoy the protection of the constitution, so that it can protect our rights as citizens.”

If you like our journalism support us to continue bringing you groundbreaking and agenda setting stories.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.