Ruling of case in which lawyer has been sued over Sh 21m agreement dispute set


Milimani Law Court. PHOTO/COURTESY


Justice Maureen Odera of the High Court in Nairobi has set the ruling for a case in which lawyer Abib Zam Zam Abdi has been sued for failing to honour a Sh 21 million agreement for March 13, 2020.

Businessman Salim Ali Sheikh has sued lawyer Abib Zam Zam Abdi of Abid & Associates Advocates for reneging on an irrevocable undertaking to remit Sh 21 million for professional services he had provided to Halal Meat Products Ltd.

The plaintiff claims that on November 30, 2018 he entered into an agreement with the lawyer to undertake professional services for Halal Meat Products Ltd and on successful completion be paid Sh 21 million.

During submissions before Justice Odera, lawyer Duncan Okatch for the plantiff said although his client discharged his responsibilities as agreed the defendant did not honour their agreement.

The plaintiff had been contracted by Halal Meat Products Ltd to help process pending compensation payment from the National Land Commission (NLC) which he did.

Lawyer Okatch told the court that although NLC paid Halal Meat Products Ltd Sh 104 million in compensation,  lawyer Abib Zam Zam Abdi or Abid & Associates Advocates did not remit the agreed Sh 21 million to his client.

Lawyer Abib Zam Zam Abdi of Abid & Associates Advocates. PHOTO/FACEBOOK

Mr Okatch said after NLC paid Halal Meat Products Ltd the defendant on January 29, 2019 agreed to pay his client Ksh 6 million through a Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) transfer via First Community Bank.

He said this RTGs transaction was witnessed by an advocate of the High Court but after two days, the defendant caused the cancellation of the RTGs payment.

“The transaction was mysteriously reversed even after the deduction of the money from the defendant’s account,” he said.

Mr Okatch argued that reasons given by the defendant as to why they did not honour the agreement with his client were misleading as the irrevocable undertaking was between the lawyer and the plaintiff.

He said courts have a duty to exercise punitive and disciplinary powers over advocates to ensure compliance of legal undertakings.

However, the defendant’s lawyer argued that the relationship between the plaintiff  and the defendant were highly contested and the plaintiff could not justify the work he did to warrant the payment of Sh 21 million.

The lawyer said the Sh 6 million that was allegedly paid to the plaintiff and later reversed was for a different undertaking. Justice Odera said she will deliver her ruling on the matter on March 13, 2020.

Help us to report stories that expose human rights violations, corruption, environmental degradation, spark reforms and generally spotlight issues of public interest.
While traditional news reporting is losing its relevance, serious investigation now requires more than basic journalistic skills. To do this we require a lot of resources.

Nelson Mandela once said: “A critical, independent, and investigative press is the lifeblood of any democracy. The press must be free from state interference. It must have the economic strength to stand up to the blandishments of government officials. It must have sufficient independence from vested interests to be bold and inquiring without fear or favor. It must enjoy the protection of the constitution, so that it can protect our rights as citizens.”

If you like our journalism support us to continue bringing you groundbreaking and agenda setting stories.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.